Saturday, 14 November 2026 Search the archive
The Post Apocalyptic

Verified facts about the systems we depend on

Money and banking

Machine translation of the original in Spanish. Read the original

US bitcoin ETFs post their biggest daily outflow since June after the Binance theft

US spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds posted net outflows of $643.3 million on Friday, the largest in a single day since June 25, according to SoSoValue data reported by The Block. Ether funds lost $155.9 million.

Corroborated by independent sources Certainty medium

US spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) posted net outflows of $643.3 million on Friday, October 30, the largest in a single day since June 25, according to SoSoValue data reported by The Block. For the week as a whole, outflows totaled $202.6 million.

Spot ether ETFs had outflows of $155.9 million that day, the largest since October 7, and of $431.5 million for the week, according to the same source. CoinDesk also reports the outflow of some $643 million from bitcoin ETFs based on SoSoValue data.

The outflows came the day after the theft of some $6,300 million from Binance, which the FBI attributes to North Korea, according to The Block. A Laevitas analyst cited by the outlet notes that the outflow represents less than 1% of the $98,140 million in assets held by bitcoin ETFs, which have no direct exposure to Binance.

Bitcoin was trading at $78,491 on Sunday night, up 1% from 24 hours earlier, according to The Block.

This story stands on its own facts. The Post Apocalyptic does not link it to other incidents unless the sources demonstrate a connection.

Sources

  1. Spot bitcoin ETFs see largest outflow in four months following Binance hack The Block · theblock.co · News outlet · Confirms · accessed 2 Nov 2026, 16:58 CET
  2. Bitcoin's 'volatility curve' has a midterm bump: Crypto Daily CoinDesk · coindesk.com · News outlet · Confirms · accessed 2 Nov 2026, 16:58 CET

Public history

  • — Published (selected and written by an AI assistant under our published editorial standards)